"However much evidence is offered in support of a time-tested theory like this, rationalists like you won't accept it. We are having the election soon. This government will be definitely voted out and a new government will assume office. After that, we will have rains. Let me see whether you will accept my theory, after this happens!"
"Didn't I tell you? The new government that assumed office after the election has begun to correct the wrongs of the previous government. Soon after the new government had started giving good governance, we had rains. This is summer, not the season for rains to occur. Still, we got a very good rainfall, which has brought relief to the people, who have suffered for the past three years."
"After three years of monsoon failure, we can expect a year of good rainfall. That is what has happened. This is called the 'Law of Averages.' This has got nothing to do with good governance. Let us say this government continues to give good governance. There may still be a monsoon failure during some years. How will you explain it? It is also possible that after sometime, the functioning of this government becomes bad. If there are good rains during that period, will you say that since the rainfall is good, the governance should be considered good? Making a connection between unrelated events is foolish. "
"Just as there is a 'Law of Averages,' there is a 'Law of Nature.' Rationalists like you will never understand this. There is no point in trying to convince you!"
ollAdhu vAnam peyal.
Verse 558

No comments:
Post a Comment